Skip to main content

Citations

  • 292 A.D.2d 797
  • 740 N.Y.S.2d 167

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “‘write-off’. . . 2 is not an item of damages for which plantiff may recover because plaintiff has incurred no liability therefor”
  • \[Medicare] write-off ... is not an item of damages for which the plaintiff may recover because plaintiff has incurred no liability therefor.\
  • “[Medicare] write-off ... is not an item of damages for which the plaintiff may recover because plaintiff has incurred no liability therefor.”
  • write off is not a payment from a collateral source

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Kastick v. U-Haul Co.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.