Dyet v. McKinley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Medicare write-offs are not a collateral source and cannot be recovered
• holding that UM insurance benefits are a collateral source
• holding that UM insurance- benefits are a collateral source
• “[T]he [Medicare] 'write-off ... is not an item of damages for which plaintiff may recover because plaintiff has incurred no liability therefore.”
• \[T]he [Medicare] write-off ... is not an item of damages for which plaintiff may recover because plaintiff has incurred no liability therefore.\
• “write-off is not technically a collateral source”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).