Rees v. Albertson's, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that causation requires reasonable foreseeability, which involves a factual question “generally for the fact-trier, court or jury, to determine”
• stating that causation 12 requires reasonable foreseeability, which involves a factual question “generally for the fact-trier, court or jury, to determine”
• suggesting in dicta that Rule 60(b)(7) is appropriate mechanism to request reconsideration of earlier denial of motion for summary judgment
• intoxicated minor is entitled to have a determination made as to the seller’s misconduct in providing him with beer in action for contribution
• reasonable minds could believe that selling beer to a minor could be the foreseeable proximate cause of an accident, so the jury should be given this to determine
• reasonable minds could believe that selling beer to a minor could be the foreseeable proximate cause of an accident, so the jury should be given this to determine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).