Skip to main content
· 3/23/1982

Robbins v. Finlay

Citations

  • 645 P.2d 623
  • 1982 Utah LEXIS 927

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that even though employee “was a sophisticated salesperson” there was “no showing that his services were special, unique, or extraordinary, even if their value to his employer was high”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart, Oaks, Howe, Hall, Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.