C.D. Illinois· 3/30/1992
Kas v. Caterpillar, Inc.
Citations
- 815 F. Supp. 1158
- 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21584
- 1992 WL 454818
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- on motion to dismiss, predictive statement held actionable even-where modified by “expect”
- on motion to dismiss, predictive statement held actionable even where modified by \expect\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mihm
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Caterpillar, Inc. v. Great American Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeSeventh Circuit· 1995-09-15· cited 26×
- Schaffer v. Timberland Co.D. New Hampshire· 1996-03-18· cited 25×
- Simon v. American Power Conversion Corp.D. Rhode Island· 1996-11-13· cited 22×
- In Re Discovery Zone Securities LitigationN.D. Illinois· 1996-09-27· cited 16×
- In Re Compaq Securities LitigationS.D. Texas· 1993-12-28· cited 11×
- Caterpillar Inc. v. Great American InsuranceC.D. Illinois· 1994-09-15· cited 6×
- Selbst v. McDonald's Corp.N.D. Illinois· 2006-05-17· cited 4×
- Levie v. Sears Roebuck & Co.N.D. Illinois· 2009-12-18· cited 1×
- Schaffer v. Timberland C o .D. New Hampshire· 1996-03-18
Cites
60 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court· 1984-05-22· cited 5,292×
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 3,533×
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court· 1988-03-07· cited 3,007×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & YoungSeventh Circuit· 1990-06-12· cited 1,050×
- Goldman v. BeldenSecond Circuit· 1985-02-12· cited 788×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,697 John P. Decker v. Massey-Ferguson, LimitedSecond Circuit· 1982-06-03· cited 438×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,887 Sundstrand Corporation v. Sun Chemical CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1977-04-18· cited 412×
- In Re Apple Computer Securities LitigationNinth Circuit· 1989-09-25· cited 404×
- Cosmas v. HassettSecond Circuit· 1989-09-12· cited 371×
- Jorge Gomez v. Illinois State Board of Education and Ted Sanders, in His Official Capacity as Illinois State Superintendent of EducationSeventh Circuit· 1987-01-30· cited 335×
- American Nurses' Association v. State of IllinoisSeventh Circuit· 1986-04-04· cited 272×
- Beck v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.Second Circuit· 1987-06-01· cited 272×
- Ruth Panter v. Marshall Field & Co., Richard Weiss v. Marshall Field & Co.Seventh Circuit· 1981-07-06· cited 269×
- Wahba v. New York UniversitySupreme Court· 1974-10-15· cited 264×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,405 Joe L. Smallwood v. Pearl Brewing Company, Southdown, Inc., Zapata Norness, Inc., Albert J. Rangeand D. Doyle MizeFifth Circuit· 1974-02-19· cited 238×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,030 Henry T. Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1977-06-08· cited 185×
- J. J. Blonien & Associates, Inc. v. Community Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court· 1990-10-29· cited 175×
- Bernard A. Schlifke and Harvey Kallick, D/B/A K & S Investments Co., a Partnership v. Seafirst Corp. And Seattle-First National BankFirst Circuit· 1989-01-19· cited 173×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,864 Pearl J. Barker v. Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, and Taylor, Edenfield, Gilliam & WiltshireSeventh Circuit· 1986-07-30· cited 170×
- Cluett, Peabody & Co. v. LHLC Corp.Supreme Court· 1988-10-31· cited 167×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.