Simon v. American Power Conversion Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying defendants’ 12(b)(6) motion as to plaintiffs’ section 20(a) claims because “a number of the challenged statements are indeed actionable under 10(b)”
• “significance of newly emerging international markets and the vast potential for [our] products” mere puffery
• statement- recognizing “significance of newly emerging international markets and the -vast potential for [defendant’s] products in these areas of the world” was “little more than corporate eheerleading”
• statement recognizing “significance of newly emerging international markets and the vast potential for [defendant’s] products in these areas of the world” was “little more than corporate cheerleading”
• statements that company had a “global focus that many of [its] competitors do not,” was “improving manufacturing efficiencies,” and had “good opportunities to expand its products offerings” were “little more than sales talk” and immaterial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).