Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 5/31/1991

Karkaria v. Karkaria

Citations

  • 592 A.2d 64
  • 405 Pa. Super. 176
  • 1991 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1501

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[a] party who has acquiesced in an order or judgment will not later be heard to challenge it.”
  • stating that “[a] party who has acquiesced in an order or judgment will not later be heard to challenge it” (citation omitted)
  • rejecting husband’s attempt to recover alimony paid, when counsel had signed a consent order on his behalf withdrawing any objections to the award
  • “A party who has acquiesced in an order or judgment will not later be heard to challenge it.”
  • party who acquiesced to order or judgment may not later be heard to challenge it
  • a party “who has acquiesced in an order or judgment will not later be heard to challenge it” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cirillo, Elliott, Brosky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Karkaria v. Karkaria

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.