Prensky, M. v. Talaat, T.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating, in determining what statute of limitations to apply to a section 301 suit, that the suit “closely resembles an action for breach of contract cognizable at common law”
• applying Indiana’s six-year statute applicable to suits on unwritten contracts
• suggesting possible use of state saving statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).