Laudig v. Laudig

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that, because an agreement contained a clause stating the intent of the parties to be legally bound, the agreement “is enforceable even without consideration under the Uniform Written Obligations Act”
• evaluating the validity of an infidelity clause based on the public policy of Pennsylvania
• “The parties’ intent, as expressed in their post-nuptial agreement in this case, is clear. Husband and wife contractually agreed to dispose of their marital property in a specified manner in the event of infidelity on wife’s part.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).