Karbel v. Comerica Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “proffered evidence constitut[ing] only a mere possibility . . . is insufficient to raise a material question of fact and overcome [a] summary disposition motion”
• stating that “a party opposing a motion for summary disposition must present more than conjecture and speculation to establish that genuine issue of material fact exists.”
• “A conjecture is simply an explanation consistent with known facts or conditions, but not deducible from them as a reasonable inference.”
• “A conjecture is simply an explanation consistent with known facts or conditions, but not deducible from them as a reasonable inference.”
• “[P]arties opposing a motion for summary disposition must present more than conjecture and speculation to meet their burden of providing evidentiary proof establishing a genuine issue of material fact.”
• “[P]arties opposing a motion for summary disposition must present more than conjecture and speculation to meet their burden of providing evidentiary proof establishing a genuine issue of material fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).