Palazzola v. Karmazin Products Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding no knowledge of certain injury from harmful vapors where a “decision to clean the tank was made on the spot” by a nonsupervisory employee
• “Recognizing that direct evidence of intent is often unavailable, . . . the second sentence of the exception provides an alternative means of proving an employer’s intent to injure.” (citing Travis, 453 Mich. at 172–73)
• suggesting that the employer’s conduct must be “egregious”
• suggesting that the employer’s conduct must be “egregious”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).