Kaminski v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating evidence is speculative when it merely provides an explanation consistent with known facts and does not provide a reasonable factual basis from which to make logical inferences
• If... [the] plaintiff has proven sufficient facts to justify a verdict upon one theory, the fact that there may be one or more other seemingly rational explanations of the episode in no manner precludes a recovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).