Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2/16/1999
Demaria v. Demaria
Citations
- 247 Conn. 715
- 724 A.2d 1088
- 1999 Conn. LEXIS 24
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- considering statutory definition of \cohabitation\ in determining meaning of that term as used in dissolution judgment; statute was useful source of common-law policy and could be used as definitional source
- considering statutory definition of ‘‘cohabita- tion’’ in determining meaning of that term as used in dissolution judgment; statute was useful source of com- mon-law policy and could be used as definitional source
- both requirements for cohabitation set forth in § 46b-86 [b] apply to judgment even when judgment does not define cohabitation or reference statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Katz, McDonald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hopkins v. O'CONNORSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-07-03· cited 70×
- Remillard v. RemillardSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-07-13· cited 67×
- Gervais v. GervaisConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-10-11· cited 36×
- Cushman v. CushmanConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-01-17· cited 17×
- Behrns v. BehrnsConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-11-25· cited 14×
- C & J Builders & Remodelers, LLC v. GeisenheimerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-06-29· cited 12×
- Krichko v. KrichkoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-06-24· cited 10×
- Spencer v. SpencerConnecticut Appellate Court· 2017-10-31· cited 10×
- Distefano v. DistefanoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-01-15· cited 9×
- Clark v. ClarkConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-11-06· cited 8×
- Nation-Bailey v. BaileyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2013-07-23· cited 7×
- Racsko v. RacskoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-06-26· cited 4×
- Nation-Bailey v. BaileySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2015-04-21
- Grimes v. GrimesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2015-05-20
- Murphy v. MurphyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2018-05-08
- Bloomfield Health Care Center of Connecticut, LLC v. DoyonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2018-10-09
- Fredo v. FredoConnecticut Superior Court· 2005-12-12
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hamm v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-05-06· cited 174×
- Connolly v. ConnollySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-09-13· cited 149×
- Kaplan v. KaplanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-03-02· cited 139×
- Conference Center Ltd. v. TRC—The Research Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-02-08· cited 99×
- Fahy v. FahySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-31· cited 82×
- Olean v. TregliaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-07-26· cited 75×
- Novicki v. City of New HavenConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-02-24· cited 71×
- New England Savings Bank v. LopezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-24· cited 64×
- Wolk v. WolkSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-09-06· cited 63×
- Kaplan v. KaplanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-07-21· cited 50×
- Canton Motorcar Works, Inc. v. DiMartinoConnecticut Appellate Court· 1986-03-11· cited 34×
- Boyd v. BoydCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1964-07-08· cited 29×
- DeMaria v. DeMariaConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-02-24· cited 9×
- Demaria v. DemariaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-04-15· cited 1×
Other cases named Demaria v. Demaria
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.