Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Federal Circuit· 12/5/1994

Kanemoto v. Reno

Citations

  • 41 F.3d 641
  • 1994 WL 673491

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling the Claims Court has jurisdiction where plaintiff alleged the Justice Department’s decision not to award her restitution under the Civil Liberties Act of 1988 violated equal protection and due process clauses
  • noting that, With limited exceptions, only monetary relief is available from this court
  • \Kanemoto cannot escape the conclusion merely by framing her claim for relief in declaratory or injunctive terms\
  • “[Wjhere agency action is otherwise reviewable in court and an adequate remedy is available in connection with that review, the APA’s waiver of sovereign immunity under section 702 is not available.”
  • “[B]e-cause the range of relief available in the Court of Federal Claims is limited, the waiver of sovereign immunity provided under the Tucker Act will not always provide an adequate remedy in a suit against the United States.”
  • \[A] `naked money judgment' would provide Kanemoto an adequate remedy.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Archer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Kanemoto v. Reno

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.