· 10/15/1993
Carl and Mary Shelden v. United States
Citations
- 7 F.3d 1022
- 136 A.L.R. Fed. 771
- 93 Daily Journal DAR 13400
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 27028
- 1993 WL 408219
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- taking of a security interest when it was made unenforceable by government seizure of the property
- “Because we do not consider issues raised for the first 8 time in reply briefs, we deem this late-raised argument forfeited.”
- a court cannot “in practical effect, ... become[ ] the lawyer for the [plaintiff], performing the lawyer's duty....”
- \Title to forfeited property transfers to the United States upon entry of a judgment of forfeiture.\ (citing United States v. Stowell, 133 U.S. 1, 17 (1890))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mayer, Michel, Lourie
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.