Skip to main content
· 10/15/1993

Carl and Mary Shelden v. United States

Citations

  • 7 F.3d 1022
  • 136 A.L.R. Fed. 771
  • 93 Daily Journal DAR 13400
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 27028
  • 1993 WL 408219

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • taking of a security interest when it was made unenforceable by government seizure of the property
  • “Because we do not consider issues raised for the first 8 time in reply briefs, we deem this late-raised argument forfeited.”
  • a court cannot “in practical effect, ... become[ ] the lawyer for the [plaintiff], performing the lawyer's duty....”
  • \Title to forfeited property transfers to the United States upon entry of a judgment of forfeiture.\ (citing United States v. Stowell, 133 U.S. 1, 17 (1890))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mayer, Michel, Lourie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.