Kaiser v. Stathas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting a jury need not accept testimony that is “contrary to natural laws, inherently improbable or unreasonable, opposed to common knowledge, inconsistent with other circumstances established in evidence, or . . . contradictory within itself”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).