State v. Frake

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that reasonableness of a witness’s testimony may be considered in determining believability of testimony
• stating court may consider “the witness’s interest in the trial” to assess witness’s credibility
• stating a jury may consider a witness’s memory and knowledge of facts in determining the witness’s credibility
• district court’s finding that defendant did not request statutory right to call attorney prior to chemical test supported by substantial evidence
• “When determining the credibility of the testimony of witnesses, the trial court may consider . . . the witness’s interest in the trial.”
• “Even if the testimony of a witness as to a fact is not controverted by other testimony, the finder of fact may reject the testimony if found not to be credible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).