Foggia v. Des Moines Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the jury can accept or reject any portions of the conflicting evidence it chooses
• stating that the jury can accept or reject any portions of the conflicting evidence it chooses
• discussing the inapplicability of § 433 B to situations involving only one tortfeasor
• discussing the inapplicability of § 433 B to situations involving only one tortfeasor
• jury’s award of damages for pain and suffering but no award of damages for medical expenses was not inconsistent because the jury could have “found none of his medical expenses were caused by the fall at issue”
• jury’s award of damages for pain and suffering but no award of damages for medical expenses was not inconsistent because the jury could have “found none of his medical expenses were caused by the fall at issue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).