Kahn v. IBI Armored Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the “[MCA] exemption was adopted . . . to avoid any problems that might arise if two government agencies had overlapping jurisdiction”
• “Simply put, double damages are the norm, single damages the exception, the burden on the employer.” (quotations and citation omitted)
• “Simply put, double damages are the norm, single damages the exception, the burden on the employer.” (quotations and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).