Hard Drive Productions, Inc. v. DOES 1-188

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• severing and dismissing all but one Doe defendant in part because plaintiff’s allegations in support of joinder were “speculative and conclusory.”
• severing and dismissing all but one Doe Defendant in part because the plaintiff’s allegations in support of joinder were “speculative and conclusory”
• finding misjoinder based on presence of 188 defendants
• “[P]ermitting joinder in this case would undermine Rule 20(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).