Justice v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding warrantless seizure of items from an automobile is only justified where officer has probable cause to believe that property to be seized is connected to criminal activity”
• \[T]he Fourth Amendment does not require a separate exigency requirement for the automobile exception.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Myers v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2005-12-21· cited 128×
• Best v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2005-01-27· cited 16×
• Roehling v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-10-18· cited 5×
• Fox v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2003-10-30· cited 4×
• Black v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2003-09-16· cited 2×
• Doyle Burton v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-11-09
• Zachary J. Taylor v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2019-03-22
• Anthony Eugene Carter v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2023-10-25

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Ross
  Supreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,985×
• California v. Carney
  Supreme Court· 1985-05-13· cited 1,276×
• Maryland v. Dyson
  Supreme Court· 1999-06-21· cited 695×
• Pennsylvania v. Labron
  Supreme Court· 1996-07-01· cited 668×
• Brown v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1995-07-11· cited 181×
• Johnson v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-04-18· cited 35×
• Hester v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1990-03-29· cited 23×
• Justice v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-03-19· cited 22×