Skip to main content
· 10/18/2002

Roehling v. State

Citations

  • 776 N.E.2d 961
  • 2002 Ind. App. LEXIS 1705
  • 2002 WL 31340884

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that court considers conflicting evidence in light most favorable to the state, and uncontradicted evidence in the light most favorable to defendant.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Baker, Vaidik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.