Skip to main content

Juarez v. Windsor Rock Products, Inc.

Citations

  • 144 P.3d 211
  • 341 Or. 160

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that loss of deceased’s society, guidance, and emotional support did not constitute injury to person, property, or reputation within the meaning of the remedy clause
  • explaining that loss of deceased’s society, guidance, and emotional support did not constitute injury to person, property, or reputation within the meaning of the remedy clause
  • explaining that loss of deceased’s society, guidance, and emotional support did not constitute injury to person, property, or reputation within the meaning of the remedy clause
  • noting the issue but determining that it was not necessary to resolve it in that case
  • considering whether the Remedy Clause protected a loss of consortium claim brought by a parent and adult children of a person who was killed as the result of the negligence of the person’s employer
  • referring to Article I, section 10, as containing a “remedy clause”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Juarez v. Windsor Rock Products, Inc.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.