Oregon Supreme Court· 7/14/2006
Juarez v. Windsor Rock Products, Inc.
Citations
- 144 P.3d 211
- 341 Or. 160
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that loss of deceased’s society, guidance, and emotional support did not constitute injury to person, property, or reputation within the meaning of the remedy clause
- explaining that loss of deceased’s society, guidance, and emotional support did not constitute injury to person, property, or reputation within the meaning of the remedy clause
- explaining that loss of deceased’s society, guidance, and emotional support did not constitute injury to person, property, or reputation within the meaning of the remedy clause
- noting the issue but determining that it was not necessary to resolve it in that case
- considering whether the Remedy Clause protected a loss of consortium claim brought by a parent and adult children of a person who was killed as the result of the negligence of the person’s employer
- referring to Article I, section 10, as containing a “remedy clause”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Durham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.