Oregon Supreme Court· 7/14/2006
Juarez v. Windsor Rock Products, Inc.
Citations
- 144 P.3d 211
- 341 Or. 160
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that loss of deceased’s society, guidance, and emotional support did not constitute injury to person, property, or reputation within the meaning of the remedy clause
- explaining that loss of deceased’s society, guidance, and emotional support did not constitute injury to person, property, or reputation within the meaning of the remedy clause
- explaining that loss of deceased’s society, guidance, and emotional support did not constitute injury to person, property, or reputation within the meaning of the remedy clause
- noting the issue but determining that it was not necessary to resolve it in that case
- considering whether the Remedy Clause protected a loss of consortium claim brought by a parent and adult children of a person who was killed as the result of the negligence of the person’s employer
- referring to Article I, section 10, as containing a “remedy clause”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Durham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Horton v. Oregon Health & Science UniversityOregon Supreme Court· 2016-05-05· cited 82×
- Doe v. Lake Oswego School DistrictOregon Supreme Court· 2013-03-07· cited 50×
- Lowe v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 2008-05-01· cited 32×
- Hughes v. PeaceHealthOregon Supreme Court· 2008-02-22· cited 26×
- Mid-Century Insurance v. PerkinsOregon Supreme Court· 2008-02-28· cited 24×
- Howell v. BoyleOregon Supreme Court· 2013-03-14· cited 20×
- Hamilton v. PaynterOregon Supreme Court· 2006-12-07· cited 17×
- Rains v. Stayton Builders Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-01-04· cited 9×
- Union Bank of California, N.A. v. Copeland Lumberyards, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-06-13· cited 5×
- Christiansen v. PROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEM OF OREGON CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-12-27· cited 5×
- Pritchard v. Regence Bluecross BlueshieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-01-28· cited 5×
- Groth v. Hyundai Precision and Ind. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-12-13· cited 4×
- Taylor v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-07-05· cited 2×
- Lunsford v. NCH Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-06-03· cited 1×
- Horton v. OHSUOregon Supreme Court· 2016-05-05
- Pierce v. Best Western Int.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-04-10
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Smothers v. Gresham Transfer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 2001-05-10· cited 156×
- Insurance Co. v. BrameSupreme Court· 1878-01-21· cited 118×
- Mayhew v. BurnsIndiana Supreme Court· 1885-10-27· cited 74×
- G. L. v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-06-07· cited 67×
- Kilminster v. Day Management Corp.Oregon Supreme Court· 1996-07-18· cited 60×
- Heino v. HarperOregon Supreme Court· 1988-08-02· cited 47×
- Storm v. McClungOregon Supreme Court· 2002-06-07· cited 44×
- Coast Range Conifers, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oregon State Board of ForestryOregon Supreme Court· 2005-08-11· cited 37×
- Goheen v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court· 1972-09-21· cited 33×
- Putman v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1891-07-15· cited 29×
- Schleiger v. Northern Terminal Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1903-05-01· cited 26×
- Plummer v. WebbU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine· 1827-05-15· cited 24×
- Lawson v. HokeOregon Supreme Court· 2005-09-09· cited 20×
- Juarez v. Windsor Rock Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-02-16· cited 1×
Other cases named Juarez v. Windsor Rock Products, Inc.
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.