Skip to main content
· 3/7/2013

Doe v. Lake Oswego School District

Citations

  • 353 Or. 321
  • 297 P.3d 1287
  • 2013 WL 856284
  • 2013 Ore. LEXIS 152

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing standard of review for motion to dismiss claims as barred by provision of the Oregon Tort Claims Act
  • “The discovery rule applies an objec- tive standard—how a reasonable person of ordinary pru- dence would have acted in the same or a similar situation.”
  • “A court cannot decide [whether a claim had accrued at a particular time] as a matter of law unless the only conclusion that a reasonable trier of fact could reach is that the plaintiff knew or should have known the critical facts at a specified time.”
  • in context of statute of limitations for a civil battery claim based on sexual abuse of young children, the question of “whether * * * alleged conduct was in fact offensive” should not be conflated with the question of whether a plaintiff “recognized that fact when the touching occurred”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Balmer, Kistler, Walters, Linder, Brewer, Baldwin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.