Skip to main content
· 7/9/1987

Jourdain v. Dineen

Citations

  • 527 A.2d 1304
  • 1987 Me. LEXIS 748

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that pecuniary damages are essential to a fraudulent misrepresentation cause of action
  • holding that pecuniary damages are essential to a fraudulent misrepresentation cause of action
  • holding that pecuniary damages are essential to a fraudulent misrepresentation cause of action
  • “uncollectibility of a judgment should be treated as a matter constituting an avoidance or mitigation of the consequences of one’s negligent act”
  • the plaintiffs sued their attorney for lying about filing their personal injury action within the statute of limitations, thereby causing them emotional distress
  • even assuming negligent representation, client must prove he could have been successful in underlying action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKusick, Nichols, Glassman, Scolnik, Clifford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.