· 7/9/1987
Jourdain v. Dineen
Citations
- 527 A.2d 1304
- 1987 Me. LEXIS 748
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that pecuniary damages are essential to a fraudulent misrepresentation cause of action
- holding that pecuniary damages are essential to a fraudulent misrepresentation cause of action
- holding that pecuniary damages are essential to a fraudulent misrepresentation cause of action
- “uncollectibility of a judgment should be treated as a matter constituting an avoidance or mitigation of the consequences of one’s negligent act”
- the plaintiffs sued their attorney for lying about filing their personal injury action within the statute of limitations, thereby causing them emotional distress
- even assuming negligent representation, client must prove he could have been successful in underlying action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McKusick, Nichols, Glassman, Scolnik, Clifford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.