Kituskie v. Corbman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[fjollowing a trial on the matter ... a jury found that [the defendants] were liable to [the plaintiff] for legal malpractice in the amount of $2,300,000.”
• requiring “proof of actual loss rather than a breach of a professional duty causing only nominal damages, speculative harm or the threat of future harm”
• to maintain cause of action in negligence for legal professional malpractice, complainant must demonstrate: 1
• “Issues not properly developed or argued in the argument section of an appellate brief are waived.”
• “An essential element to [legal malpractice] is proof of actual loss rather than a breach of a professional duty causing only ... speculative harm or the threat of future harm.”
• “[a]n essential element to [a legal malpratice] cause of action is proof of actual loss rather than a breach of a professional duty causing only nominal damages, speculative harm or the threat of future harm.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).