· 4/6/1976
McDow v. Dixon
Citations
- 226 S.E.2d 145
- 138 Ga. App. 338
- 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2152
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- measure of client's damages is the amount of the judgment which would have been collectible
- judgment against legal malpractice defendant reduced to amount of underlying tortfeasor’s insurance coverage where plaintiff failed to introduce business records, financial statements, or assets to prove collectibility over and above insurance
- “A client suing his attorney for malpractice not only must prove that his claim was valid and would have resulted in a judgment in his favor, but also that said judgment would have been collectible in some amount, for therein lies the measure of his damages.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stolz, Bell, Clark
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.