Joshua Williams v. TESCO Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting contention that Rule 26(e) precluded district court from enforcing discovery deadlines by striking untimely disclosure
• noting the inapplicability of Rule 26(e) where an expert “was materially altering, not merely clarifying his original report”
• “[A] motion for leave to amend filed outside the district court’s Rule 16(b) scheduling order requires a showing of good cause[.]” (citations omitted)
• describing the standard as “liberal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).