Skip to main content
· 1/18/2007

Marlar v. Daniel

Citations

  • 247 S.W.3d 473
  • 368 Ark. 505
  • 2007 Ark. LEXIS 43

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding foreseeability was one element in- determining whether duty was owed
  • “In order to prove negligence, there must be a failure to exercise proper care in the performance of a legal duty which the defendant owed the plaintiff under the circumstances surrounding them.”
  • Lawhon Farm Supply, Inc. v. Hayes , 316 Ark. 69 , 870 S.W.2d 729 (1994) ; Keck v. American Employment Agency, Inc. , 279 Ark. 294 , 652 S.W.2d 2 (1983)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Annabelle Clinton Imber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.