Skip to main content
· 7/3/2008

Sherman v. Winco Fireworks, Inc.

Citations

  • 532 F.3d 709
  • 70 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1543
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 14199
  • 2008 WL 2609165

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that undue prejudice should only be evaluated if the movant is diligent in seeking amendment
  • observing that the “primary measure of good cause is the movant’s diligence in attempting to meet the [scheduling] order’s requirements” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • holding undue prejudice should only be explored if the movant has been found diligent
  • the focus of the “good cause” standard for belated amendments under Rule 16(b) is the diligence of the movant
  • “The primary measure of good cause is the movant’s diligence in attempting to meet the orders’ requirements.”
  • “The interplay between Rule 15(a) and Rule 16(b) is settled in this circuit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Hansen, Melloy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.