· 7/3/2008
Sherman v. Winco Fireworks, Inc.
Citations
- 532 F.3d 709
- 70 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1543
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 14199
- 2008 WL 2609165
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that undue prejudice should only be evaluated if the movant is diligent in seeking amendment
- observing that the “primary measure of good cause is the movant’s diligence in attempting to meet the [scheduling] order’s requirements” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- holding undue prejudice should only be explored if the movant has been found diligent
- the focus of the “good cause” standard for belated amendments under Rule 16(b) is the diligence of the movant
- “The primary measure of good cause is the movant’s diligence in attempting to meet the orders’ requirements.”
- “The interplay between Rule 15(a) and Rule 16(b) is settled in this circuit.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wollman, Hansen, Melloy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.