Jones v. William Buick, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where the plaintiffs had not abandoned their claim under the Consumer Fraud Act, like the plaintiff in Hayman had, there was a statutory basis for recovery of attorney fees, and the defendant’s refund of only the plaintiffs’ down payment precluded application of the holding in Hayman
• where the plaintiffs had not abandoned their claim under the Consumer Fraud Act, like the plaintiff in Hayman had, there was a statutory basis for recovery of attorney fees, and the defendant's refund of only the plaintiffs' down payment precluded application of the holding in Hayman

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).