Hayman v. Autohaus on Edens, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because no class was certified at the time tender rendered moot Hayman’s claims, dismissal of the entire suit was warranted
• rejecting the plaintiff's claim that the defendant's $299 tender did not make him whole because it did not include interest
• denying punitive damages absent a showing of actual damage in a fraudulent misrepresentation action
• rejecting the plaintiffs claim that the defendant’s $299 tender did not make him whole because it did not include interest
• denying punitive damages absent a showing of actual damage in a fraudulent misrepresentation action
• First District affirmed trial court's dismissal under section 2-619, where a corporate defendant refunded the fee at issue to the plaintiff consumer before the plaintiff had begun the class action litigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).