Veterans Claims· 12/22/1998

Jones v. West

Citations

12 Vet. App. 98
1998 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 1620
1998 WL 887239

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that an “assertion of nonreceipt, standing alone, does not rebut the presumption of regularity in VA’s mailing process”
suggesting that 38 C.F.R. § 3.158(a) might refer to both documentary evidence and VA medical examinations
noting well-established caselaw that an assertion of nonreceipt, standing alone, does not rebut the presumption of regular ity that VA properly mailed notice of its decision
noting as “troubling” that the Secretary set forth in his brief to the Court the text of a 1949 regulation in support of his own position without also setting forth the text of another 1949 regulation that was “of potential benefit to the appellant”
where NOD includes unadjudicated claim, Court has jurisdiction to remand matter of Board’s failure to adjudicate claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holdaway, Nebeker, Steinberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.