Rhames v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court erred in not instructing the jury that it was precluded from returning dual convictions, and that the remedy was the vacating of the less serious count
• given statute’s prohibitory language, not precluded from raising this issue on appeal even though no objection to erroneous instructions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).