Skip to main content

Jones v. State

Citations

  • 997 A.2d 131
  • 414 Md. 686
  • 2010 Md. LEXIS 266

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that, unlike the former rule, the present rule in Maryland no longer requires a trial court to inform the defendant of his right of allocution
  • stating that the Court “agree[s] with the reasoning of Sanders”
  • analyzing the scholarly basis regarding the impact that viewing forensic crime dramas has upon juror behavior
  • “The trial court is charged, therefore, with ‘exercising its sentencing discretion’ as if the sentence was occurring for the first time.”
  • the “grounds for appellate review of sentences ... recognized in this State” include “whether the sentencing judge was motivated by ... impermissible considerations” (internal citations and quotations omitted)
  • “A trial judge has ‘very broad discretion in sentencing.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.