Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 10/2/1984

Jones v. Madison Service Corp.

Citations

  • 744 F.2d 1309
  • 35 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1711
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 18035
  • 35 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 34,691

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[If] the date on which the letter was received . . . [is] in dispute, there must be an evidentiary hearing to inquire into the specific circumstances of the case.”
  • “actual knowledge” is the “crucial concept” in this matter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Eschbach, Pell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.