Seventh Circuit· 10/2/1984
Jones v. Madison Service Corp.
Citations
- 744 F.2d 1309
- 35 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1711
- 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 18035
- 35 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 34,691
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[If] the date on which the letter was received . . . [is] in dispute, there must be an evidentiary hearing to inquire into the specific circumstances of the case.”
- “actual knowledge” is the “crucial concept” in this matter
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cudahy, Eschbach, Pell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.