Seventh Circuit· 10/19/2001
Windell Threadgill v. Moore U.S.A., Inc.
Citations
- 269 F.3d 848
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22510
- 81 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,755
- 87 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 145
- 2001 WL 1249262
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting “[t]he courts have allowed equitable tolling where the claimant ‘has actively pursued his judicial remedies’ ”
- “affirming the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of a lawsuit that was time-barred due to the plaintiff’s failure to timely file the lawsuit after receipt of the right to sue letter.”
- 90-day statute of limitations begins to run on the date claimant or attorney representing him received the let- ter
- failure of a plaintiff to understand the implication of a filing deadline does not allow a court to disregard filing requirements set by Congress
- equitable tolling might apply if “the claimant has made a good faith error (e.g., brought suit in the wrong court)”
- “A civil action alleging a Title VII violation must be filed within 90 days of receiving a right-to-sue notice from the EEOC.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaum, Posner, Ripple
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ralph L. Grayson v. Paul O'neill, Secretary, United States Department of the TreasurySeventh Circuit· 2002-10-25· cited 236×
- Brian Lax v. Alejandro MayorkasSeventh Circuit· 2021-12-20· cited 188×
- Arianna Blanche v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2016-02-02· cited 52×
- DeTata v. Rollprint Packaging Products Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2011-01-12· cited 24×
- Y. Sandra Reschny, Formerly Known as Y. Sandra Curran v. Elk Grove Plating Company, an Illinois CorporationSeventh Circuit· 2005-07-15· cited 23×
- Apostolos Xanthopoulos v. LABRSeventh Circuit· 2021-03-22· cited 21×
- Maggio v. Wisconsin Avenue Psychiatric Center, Inc.D.C. Circuit· 2015-07-24· cited 17×
- P.W. v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2021-03-05· cited 15×
- Williams v. DoyleW.D. Wisconsin· 2007-05-31· cited 14×
- Porter v. New Age Services Corp.Seventh Circuit· 2012-02-07· cited 14×
- Malozienc v. Pacific Rail ServicesN.D. Illinois· 2009-03-20· cited 9×
- Del Korth v. Supervalu, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2002-09-16· cited 9×
- Susan Kinder v. Marion County Prosecutor's OfficeSeventh Circuit· 2025-03-26· cited 8×
- Edwards v. JohnsonN.D. Illinois· 2016-07-29· cited 6×
- Lohrasbi v. Board of Trustees of the University of IllinoisC.D. Illinois· 2015-11-29· cited 5×
- Prabhakar v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaE.D. New York· 2013-08-16· cited 4×
- Douglas v. PotterSeventh Circuit· 2008-03-04· cited 3×
- Malozienc v. Pacific Rail ServicesN.D. Illinois· 2008-08-19· cited 2×
- Smith v. EMB, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2014-09-29· cited 2×
- Moses v. United States Steel Corp.N.D. Indiana· 2013-05-16· cited 2×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court· 1991-01-22· cited 3,247×
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court· 1984-06-04· cited 1,661×
- Marcia L. Saxton v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Successor to at & T Bell LaboratoriesSeventh Circuit· 1993-12-03· cited 348×
- Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, and Howard McDougall Trustee v. Thomas C. Fulkerson and Dolly S. FulkersonSeventh Circuit· 2001-01-29· cited 73×
- Jones v. Madison Service Corp.Seventh Circuit· 1984-10-02· cited 36×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.