Jones v. Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in determining child support, the computation of imputed income must not be based on family gifts or loans
• holding that trial court erred in including imputed income into its computation of the husband’s net income

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cozier v. Cozier
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-08· cited 24×
• In Re the Marriage of Petersen
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2000-07-25· cited 15×
• Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-10-07· cited 7×
• Hanley v. Hanley
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-05-26· cited 6×
• Department of Revenue v. Hinnerschietz
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-23· cited 5×
• Mills v. Mills
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-05-06· cited 2×
• George v. George
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-07-18· cited 2×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Garcia v. Garcia
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-05-02· cited 24×
• Becker v. Becker
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-07-15· cited 10×
• Kimm v. Kimm
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-02-24· cited 5×
• Elremmash v. Peterson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-07-17· cited 3×