George v. George

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, in determining the former husband's ability to pay alimony, \the trial court is also required to consider the former husband's own reasonable and necessary living expenses\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Schafstall v. Schafstall
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-02-22· cited 4×
• CARL WILL v. LISA DAWN WILL
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-06-28

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Garcia v. Garcia
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-05-02· cited 24×
• McCants v. McCants
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-07-09· cited 23×
• Chapoteau v. Chapoteau
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-09-13· cited 23×
• Thomas v. Thomas
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-07-08· cited 12×
• Jones v. Jones
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-09-20· cited 7×
• Nadrich v. Nadrich
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-06-14· cited 5×
• Chaney v. Fife
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-09-10· cited 5×
• Posner v. Posner
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-06-23· cited 4×
• Silver v. Silver
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-09· cited 2×