Jones v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We do not agree . . . that because polygraph testing is not admissible, any statement by defendant made to the polygraph operator in the pretesting conditioning period, or as a preliminary to the testing, should also be excluded.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Baynes
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1981-12-04· cited 265×
• Commonwealth v. Vitello
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1978-09-26· cited 122×
• State v. Dean
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1981-07-06· cited 89×
• Gibson v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1975-12-01· cited 44×
• Commonwealth v. Mendes
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1989-12-11· cited 38×
• State v. Blosser
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1976-12-11· cited 27×
• People v. Cummings
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1985-09-23· cited 19×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Owens v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1947-09-03· cited 49×
• Lee v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1958-10-13· cited 28×
• Barber v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1965-06-14· cited 23×
• Penn v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1969-09-05· cited 7×