Skip to main content
· 3/20/2008

Jones v. CASSEY'S GENERAL STORIES

Citations

  • 538 F. Supp. 2d 1094
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22940
  • 2008 WL 731960

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a complaint alleging that the plaintiffs “regularly worked regular time and overtime each week but were not paid regular and overtime wages” was “implausible on its face” (quotation marks omitted)
  • holding that a complaint alleging that the plaintiffs “regularly worked regular time and overtime each week but were not paid regular and overtime wages” was “implausible on its face” (quotation marks omitted)
  • “the Illinois legislature did not intend to create a private right of action when it enacted [ODRISA]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robert W. Pratt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.