Skip to main content
N.D. Texas· 9/28/2011

Jones v. Astrue

Citations

  • 821 F. Supp. 2d 842
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111381
  • 2011 WL 4498872

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting it is reversible error when an ALJ “explicitly rejects one or more of the claimant’s impairments . . . and proceeds to the later steps of the sequential analysis only with respect to other claimed impairments”
  • noting it is reversible error when an ALJ “explicitly rejects one or more of the claimant’s impairments . . . and proceeds to the later steps of the sequential analysis only with respect to other claimed impairments”
  • “Thus, there is no ground for reversal because the ALJ proceeded beyond step two in the sequential analysis in discussing all of Plaintiff’s impairments.”
  • An ALJ is not required to perform the six-step analysis discussed in Newton when the treating physician’s opinion is not entirely rejected but is rather given less or little weight
  • Even assuming the ALJ made an error at the Step 2 severity discussion, “there is no ground for reversal because the ALJ proceeded beyond step two in the sequential analysis in discussing all of Plaintiff’s impairments.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Renã‰e Harris Toliver

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.