Larry MAYS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary, Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that procedural perfection in an ALJ’s analysis is not required as long as the plaintiff’s substantial rights are not affected
• stating that the court will not vacate a judgment unless the substantial rights of a party have been affected
• finding “[p]rocedural perfection in administrative proceedings is not required…unless the substantial rights of a party have been affected.”
• noting “[p]rocedural perfection in administrative proceedings is not required” and a court “will not vacate a judgment unless the substantial rights of a party have been affected”
• holding procedural perfection in administrative proceedings is not required
• “Remanding this case ... would produce the same result while wasting time and resources.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).