Jonathan O. Madu v. U.S. Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that section 1252(b)(9) did not apply to bar a claim contesting \the very existence of an order of removal\
• holding that a challenge to legality of detention is distinct from a challenge to the government's discretionary decision to execute a removal order and thus not barred by § 1252(g)
• holding that a “petitioner who contests the very existence of an order of removal does not seek ‘review of an order of removal’ within the meaning of the REAL ID Act”
• holding the INA did not divest the district court of jurisdiction over a § 2241 challenge to detention of the petitioner pending deportation
• holding the INA did not divest the district court of jurisdiction over a § 2241 challenge to detention of the petitioner pending deportation
• holding the INA did not divest the district court of jurisdiction over a § 2241 challenge to detention of the petitioner pending deportation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).