Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 6/24/2005

Johnson v. Wright

Citations

  • 412 F.3d 398
  • 2005 WL 1492080

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that even if a policy is “generally justifiable,” its application to a particular individual could still “amount[] to deliberate indifference to plaintiff’s medical needs”
  • holding that even if a policy is “generally justifiable,” its application to a particular individual could still “amount[] to deliberate indifference to plaintiff’s medical needs”
  • holding that a trial was necessary to determine whether senior prison officials were deliberately indifferent in enforcing a medical policy that denied treatment to inmates in certain circumstances
  • holding that even if a policy were “generally justifiable . . . the application of the policy in [a particular] case could . . . amount[] to deliberate indifference”
  • holding that a trial was necessary to determine whether senior prison officials were deliberately indifferent in enforcing a policy that denied HCV treatment to inmates with evidence of active substance abuse
  • finding that a mechanical application of a Hepatitis C guideline created a genuine question of material fact as to whether defendant acted with deliberate indifference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, Katzmann, Murtha

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.