Skip to main content
· 10/27/2006

Johnson v. State Farm Lloyds

Citations

  • 204 S.W.3d 897
  • 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 9336
  • 2006 WL 3042104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “if the parties agree there is coverage but disagree on the extent of the damage, the dispute concerns the ‘amount of loss’ and that issue is determined in accordance with the appraisal clause”
  • treating “motion to compel” as motion for summary judgment when party stated “seeking summary judgment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Whittington, Bridges, Lang-Miers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.