Holmes v. Morales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when rule or statute applies to subject, it controls over general rules, statutes, or provisions
• holding that statutes governing specific issues control over statutes governing general matter when an apparent conflict exists
• holding that statutes governing specific issues control over statutes governing general matter when an apparent conflict exists
• holding that statutes governing specific issues control over statutes governing general matter when an apparent conflict exists
• Determining that “the district attorney’s office is not included in the meaning of ‘judiciary’ because the Texas Constitution invests no judicial power in that office.”
• stating that attorney general opinions are not controlling on the courts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).