Skip to main content

Johnson v. State

Citations

  • 83 S.W.3d 229
  • 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 5082
  • 2002 WL 1579800

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding State was neither persistent nor flagrant when it did not repeat improper question concerning post-arrest silence
  • holding State was neither persistent nor flagrant when it did not repeat improper question concerning post-arrest silence
  • holding State was neither persistent nor flagrant when it did not repeat improper question concerning post-arrest silence
  • “We have nothing to explain why a prosecutor would depart from the established rules and question a defendant about his post-arrest silence.”
  • “We have nothing to explain why a prosecutor would depart from the established rules and question a defendant about his post-arrest silence.”
  • “We have nothing to explain why a prosecutor would depart from the established rules and question a defendant about his post-arrest silence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Vance, Gray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.