Skip to main content

Fletcher v. State

Citations

  • 852 S.W.2d 271
  • 1993 Tex. App. LEXIS 1422
  • 1993 WL 82918

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that one question concerning defendant’s failure to provide written statement to detective was neither flagrant nor persistent
  • concluding that one question concerning defendant’s failure to provide written statement to detective was neither flagrant nor persistent
  • concluding that one question concerning defendant’s failure to provide written statement to detective was neither flagrant nor persistent
  • “It is going to be assumed by the court that the jury is going to follow the court’s instructions, not to consider that, and that line of questions.”
  • “It is going to be assumed by the court that the jury is going to follow the court’s instructions, not to consider that, and that line of questions.”
  • “It is going to be assumed by the court that the jury is going to follow the court's instructions, not to consider that, and that line of questions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas, Maloney, Kaplan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.