Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 3/22/1993
Fletcher v. State
Citations
- 852 S.W.2d 271
- 1993 Tex. App. LEXIS 1422
- 1993 WL 82918
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that one question concerning defendant’s failure to provide written statement to detective was neither flagrant nor persistent
- concluding that one question concerning defendant’s failure to provide written statement to detective was neither flagrant nor persistent
- concluding that one question concerning defendant’s failure to provide written statement to detective was neither flagrant nor persistent
- “It is going to be assumed by the court that the jury is going to follow the court’s instructions, not to consider that, and that line of questions.”
- “It is going to be assumed by the court that the jury is going to follow the court’s instructions, not to consider that, and that line of questions.”
- “It is going to be assumed by the court that the jury is going to follow the court's instructions, not to consider that, and that line of questions.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thomas, Maloney, Kaplan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Van Zandt v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1996-03-28· cited 202×
- Veteto v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2000-01-12· cited 134×
- Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2001-08-31· cited 112×
- Russo v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-06-07· cited 95×
- Perkins v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1995-07-12· cited 92×
- Roberson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2003-04-09· cited 65×
- Ford v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2000-07-27· cited 55×
- Garza v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2000-04-06· cited 45×
- Mendoza v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1997-12-10· cited 41×
- Kimball v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2000-07-12· cited 36×
- Ex Parte TwineCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2003-10-10· cited 30×
- Garza v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1994-08-17· cited 29×
- Johnson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2002-07-17· cited 28×
- Steinbach v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1998-11-13· cited 20×
- Kesterson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1999-07-26· cited 20×
- Morales v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1995-06-14· cited 20×
- Moreno v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1997-05-01· cited 17×
- Butler v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1997-01-09· cited 11×
- Ex Parte LewisCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2005-03-10· cited 8×
- Fred Russell, Jr. v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2001-03-07· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.