Skip to main content

Johnson v. Johnson

Citations

  • 600 A.2d 965
  • 410 Pa. Super. 631
  • 1991 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3748

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that “failure to raise the issue of inadequate support of a motion for summary judgment does not result in a waiver of that issue since the trial judge has a duty to deny such motions even if the opposing party has not responded”
  • rejecting argument that the inherently dangerous nature of hunting imposes a duty upon each hunter to protect others and also finding no special relationship existed, under the Restatement (Second
  • rejecting argument that the inherently dangerous nature of hunting imposes a duty upon each hunter to protect others and also finding no special relationship existed, under the Restatement (Second
  • this court affirmed grant of summary judgment where plaintiff failed to allege facts sufficient to establish a prima facie case under proposed theories of liability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Popovich, Hudock, Cercone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.