Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 12/13/1991
Johnson v. Johnson
Citations
- 600 A.2d 965
- 410 Pa. Super. 631
- 1991 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3748
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that “failure to raise the issue of inadequate support of a motion for summary judgment does not result in a waiver of that issue since the trial judge has a duty to deny such motions even if the opposing party has not responded”
- rejecting argument that the inherently dangerous nature of hunting imposes a duty upon each hunter to protect others and also finding no special relationship existed, under the Restatement (Second
- rejecting argument that the inherently dangerous nature of hunting imposes a duty upon each hunter to protect others and also finding no special relationship existed, under the Restatement (Second
- this court affirmed grant of summary judgment where plaintiff failed to allege facts sufficient to establish a prima facie case under proposed theories of liability
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Popovich, Hudock, Cercone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Remsburg v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-08-27· cited 120×
- Dudley v. USX Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-03-04· cited 109×
- Harber Philadelphia Center City Office Ltd. v. LPCI Ltd. PartnershipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-12-21· cited 98×
- T.A. v. AllenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-12-20· cited 44×
- Walters v. UPMC Presbyterian ShadysideSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-06-19· cited 38×
- Christiansen v. SilfiesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-10-11· cited 37×
- In Re BensonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-11-06· cited 35×
- KELLY BY KELLY v. IckesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-08-09· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. BazabeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-05-15· cited 28×
- J.H. Ex Rel. Hoffman v. PellakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-12-06· cited 23×
- Keselyak v. Reach All, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-06-16· cited 22×
- Wittrien v. BurkholderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-02-06· cited 19×
- Rosenberry v. EvansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-04-23· cited 18×
- Midgette v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2004-01-05· cited 10×
- James v. Duquesne UniversityW.D. Pennsylvania· 2013-03-30· cited 9×
- Truth Freewill Baptist Church v. Berwick TownshipAdams County Court of Common Pleas· 1995-11-17
- Carbajal v. W.W. Babcock Co.Adams County Court of Common Pleas· 1996-09-12
- McConnell v. Guru Global Logistics, LLCLawrence County Court of Common Pleas· 2014-08-07
- Olinger v. ZikeliLawrence County Court of Common Pleas· 2014-12-23
- Rogers, G. v. Thomas, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-03-02
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Vattimo v. Lower Bucks Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-09-28· cited 188×
- Washington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-09-29· cited 98×
- McCain v. PennbankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-10-31· cited 66×
- Samarin v. GAF Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-09-28· cited 59×
- Moore v. PA. DEPT. OF JUSTICECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-02-25· cited 57×
- Garcia v. SavageSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-02-19· cited 51×
- Askew by Askew v. ZellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-02-19· cited 46×
- Jones v. P.M.A. InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-06-21· cited 32×
- Mucowski v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-05-02· cited 23×
- Burkhart v. Brockway Glass Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-03-31· cited 16×
- MENDOLA v. SambolSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1950-03-14· cited 15×
- Killian v. KillianSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-11-08· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.